In 2006 I wrote this in a public forum (http://lookstein.org/lookjed/read.php?1,15135,15170)
expressing my confusion about how upset people were about Facebook. I’m not
ready to point a finger at my “opponents” and tell them I them I was right; but
then again, maybe it’s time to reevaluate and realize I was more right than I
realized.
I had a thought today, one in which I felt confused (and I’m
still confused). Ever since I started teaching I’ve been told that one of the
“secrets” of capturing student attention is to learn to relate to them. Chat
with them about a movie. Go to one of their games and cheer them on. Shmooze
with them about life.
What’s the underlying message? They’ll be better students if
there’s a relationship. There’s more chance of a relationship if you’re
friendly with them on their terms, on their turf, so to speak. Now, I know that
there’s always been a boundary that should not be crossed; however, isn’t their
21st century turf, their comfort zone, the social network? Most
institutions, with good reason, frown upon or forbid student and teacher social
networking “friendships.” But isn’t the modern “going to their game”, going on
Facebook and commenting on the funny hat they wore in Disneyland? Isn’t the
teacher the out-of-touch old guy with no connection to their life if he misses
so fundamental of a part of it?
I know most will say things about the awkwardness of such a
friendship, or that it seems too much like the actions of a child predator or
the like. Well, doesn’t an old man showing up at basketball game of a bunch of
12-year-old have the same ring to it? Or has it just become so commonplace and
normal that we’ve ceased thinking of it as odd? And if so, maybe it’s time to
step into the 21st century and become a part of their lives, where
so much of their lives reside, before we’ve totally missed the boat and an
immeasurable opportunity.
No comments:
Post a Comment